|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI IPsec-Related Algorithm ProposalPoints on the hairball/tarball noted - things are sticky enough already. For the IKE subteam - Sure, sign me up. -----Original Message----- From: Black_David@emc.com [mailto:Black_David@emc.com] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 11:44 AM To: howard.c.herbert@intel.com; ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: RE: iSCSI IPsec-Related Algorithm Proposal Howard, > I will find out if anyone is writing a AES CBC MAC draft over in the IPsec > WG. If no one has started, then I will sign up to producing one. Thank you. > Also, Steve Kent's sequence number proposal DID NOT change the format on the > wire (at least that is what he says on slide #3). True, BUT ... it does change the data over which the authentication (MAC) algorithm is run (two bullets above on the same slide) - the 16 bits that aren't on the wire are included in the authentication/integrity check. Before anyone draws the wrong conclusion, Steve also proposed that this behavior be negotiable on a per-SA basis for backwards compatibility. This change really needs to be made via a modification to RFC 2406 (the basic ESP RFC), hence the concern about the security document hairball/tarball. OTOH, I was just involved in the new ECN RFC (coming soon from the RFC Editor) which managed to "update" RFC 2401 (IPsec architecture) without getting hung up, so this sort of modification isn't completely out of the question. > I think we are going to have to come to terms with folks who want to use IKE > in this application. The functionality already exists in the major host OSs > and HBA vendors are going to want to take advantage of that fact (one less > thing to add). Maybe the trick here is to define a subset of the IKE > functionality that limits the impact to target vendors. If we can do so, > would you consider making IKE mandatory to implement? It's up to the WG, but I have no fundamental problem with an IKE subset ... and I've been independently pursuing a set of volunteers to work on such a subset - want to join the party? Thanks, --David --------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140 FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500 black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:21 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |