|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] iSCSI version numberJulian: The 06-91 draft section 2.10.4 on page 57 lists the version number of the current draft as 0x2, whereas previously it was always 0x1. Shouldn't it still be 0x1?? After all, there has been no approved version 0x1, and the 06-91 draft is only a small incremental improvement over the 06 draft, not a major revision. Changing to version 0x2 implies a consensus on what 0x1 was, and there is none (was it the 06 draft, the 06 draft updated by some (all) of the mailing list e-mails that followed, or what?) What exactly would it mean to support version 0x1 when the current (still under revision draft) is 0x2 and there is no consensus on what version 0x1 was? And what criteria will you use to decide when a version number changes and when it doesn't? I believe these drafts should remain version 0x1 until the "final" draft in this sequence is approved by IETF. Otherwise, you will end up will a bunch of meaningless version numbers that will be impossible to track. Bob Russell InterOperability Lab University of New Hampshire rdr@iol.unh.edu 603-862-3774
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:21 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |