|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI Naming: iqn format specificationThat would work - REQUIRE the enterprise number and possibly RECOMMEND that it be followed by the reverse DNS name for human-friendliness. --David > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Bakke [SMTP:mbakke@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:28 PM > To: Black_David@emc.com > Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: Re: iSCSI Naming: iqn format specification > > So, should we require the enterprise number? It's a whole > lot cheaper than getting an OUI. > > Black_David@emc.com wrote: > > > > A couple of comments on this: > > > > > Anyone wanting to ensure that their names > > > will never conflict with someone else's can add the enterprise number. > > > > Nice try, but not good enough. If this course is followed the > > enterprise number has to be REQUIRED independent of the whims > > of those who are creating the names so that this conflict can't > > happen, period. > > > > > > Finally, we should use the URI name and format for the namespace > > > > where a URI format exists. This is simply for consistency. > > > > > > > > For example: > > > > backwardsdns:au.edu.example.faculty > > > > oid:1.32.43.5.3.2.43.2.2.34 > > > > oui:2e319c65786e > > > > > > I had suggested this before, in my draft on iSCSI URNs; the IESG > > > completely shot this down, and I'm still not sure why. Anyway, > > > I don't have the energy to push the URN/URI thing any further. > > > > What the IESG shot down was the notion of WWUI as a new URN > > namespace into which other namespaces could be glued. Anyone > > whose reaction to this is "but it's functionally equivalent", has missed > > the point, and should be thankful that they don't spend all their time > > on naming issues ;-). The issues here are syntax, intent, and > > control; the IESG is not prepared to allow the IPS WG to define > > a new global namespace into which the IPS WG could decide > > to glue in other namespaces at its discretion. AFAIK, the IESG > > would be interested in things like an OUI URN definition (anyone > > want to write a draft? - it should be good for at least 15 minutes of > > fame). > > > > --David > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > David L. Black, Senior Technologist > > EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > > +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140 FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500 > > black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > > --------------------------------------------------- > > -- > Mark A. Bakke > Cisco Systems > mbakke@cisco.com > 763.398.1054
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:18 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |