|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: TargetAlias/InitiatorAlias text commandsMarjorie & Jim, This artifact (the Alias keys) where introduced at the express request of the NDT. Why don't you come (came) with a similar consensus recommendation to remove them and resort to the IPS list at large? Is this the NDT consensus and you have just forgot to mention it? Julo ---------------------- Forwarded by Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM on 25-07-2001 14:59 --------------------------- "Jim Hafner" <hafner@almaden.ibm.com> on 25-07-2001 00:03:35 Please respond to "Jim Hafner" <hafner@almaden.ibm.com> To: ips@ece.cmu.edu cc: Subject: Re: TargetAlias/InitiatorAlias text commands Marj, I concur. I don't see any value in these keys either, at least within the protocol. Jim Hafner "KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <marjorie_krueger@hp.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 07-24-2001 01:38:35 PM Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu To: "Ips Reflector (E-mail)" <ips@ece.cmu.edu> cc: Subject: TargetAlias/InitiatorAlias text commands As outlined in David Black's consensus statement on the SendTargets command (http://www.pdl.cmu.edu/mailinglists/ips/mail/msg05119.html), the target records returned in response to a SendTargets request will not include TargetAlias, in response to the expressed desire to limit the SendTargets functionality to the basic description of the target iSCSI device. There are references to "aliases" sprinkled throughout the iSCSI protocol document, but this construct doesn't add any value to the iSCSI protocol model or functionality. Since the TargetAlias and InitiatorAlias text commands do not contribute any functionality to the iSCSI protocol, are not used in any iSCSI-related logic within an implementation, and are basicly a "label" more appropriately administered by a management tool, I propose they be removed from the iSCSI protocol spec. Comments? Marjorie Krueger Networked Storage Architecture Networked Storage Solutions Org. Hewlett-Packard tel: +1 916 785 2656 fax: +1 916 785 0391 email: marjorie_krueger@hp.com "KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <marjorie_krueger@hp.com> on 24-07-2001 23:38:35 Please respond to "KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <marjorie_krueger@hp.com> To: "Ips Reflector (E-mail)" <ips@ece.cmu.edu> cc: Subject: TargetAlias/InitiatorAlias text commands As outlined in David Black's consensus statement on the SendTargets command (http://www.pdl.cmu.edu/mailinglists/ips/mail/msg05119.html), the target records returned in response to a SendTargets request will not include TargetAlias, in response to the expressed desire to limit the SendTargets functionality to the basic description of the target iSCSI device. There are references to "aliases" sprinkled throughout the iSCSI protocol document, but this construct doesn't add any value to the iSCSI protocol model or functionality. Since the TargetAlias and InitiatorAlias text commands do not contribute any functionality to the iSCSI protocol, are not used in any iSCSI-related logic within an implementation, and are basicly a "label" more appropriately administered by a management tool, I propose they be removed from the iSCSI protocol spec. Comments? Marjorie Krueger Networked Storage Architecture Networked Storage Solutions Org. Hewlett-Packard tel: +1 916 785 2656 fax: +1 916 785 0391 email: marjorie_krueger@hp.com
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:12 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |