|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: reason codesThen it seems the words "Code", "response codes " and "service response codes" are confusing when used within the same context. Since one would assume they mean the same thing. As worded, "Code" and "response codes" apparently do not refer to the "service response codes" given a few lines earlier. 0x01-0x04 do but 0x05 does not. Can you change the wording to make that clear? Eddy_Quicksall@iVivity.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com> To: <ips@ece.cmu.edu> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 12:58 AM Subject: Re: iSCSI: reason codes > snack rejected - Julo > > "Eddy Quicksall" <ESQuicksall@hotmail.com> on 27-07-2001 23:13:43 > > Please respond to "Eddy Quicksall" <ESQuicksall@hotmail.com> > > To: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL > cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: iSCSI: reason codes > > > > > > Section "2.4.3 Response" says: > > 0x05 - Command in progress > > But the table says > | Code| Reason | with SCSI CHECK CONDITION | > +-----+----------------+---------------------------+ > |0x05 | SNACK rejected | ASC = 0x47 ASCQ = 0x03 | > > Which "0x05" is correct? > > Eddy_Quicksall@iVivity.com > > > >
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:09 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |