Re: iSCSI: Support Alias in the protocol

To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: iSCSI: Support Alias in the protocol
From: Stephen Bailey <steph@cs.uchicago.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:37:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM> of "Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:24:40 PDT." <FFD40DB4943CD411876500508BAD02790299374D@sj5-ex2.brocade.com>
References: <FFD40DB4943CD411876500508BAD02790299374D@sj5-ex2.brocade.com>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

Bob,

> That we call our car Skeezix (human useable, for management
> purposes within the tightly constrained context of our own
> family) is non-architected information.

What's your position on the SCSI LU alias?  Do you think that was a
bad idea too?

References:
- RE: iSCSI: Support Alias in the protocol
  - From: Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM>

Prev by Date: RE: iSCSI:Data Recovery from digest errors ...
Next by Date: Re: A Question on "Full Feature Phase" of iSCSI 07
Prev by thread: RE: iSCSI: Support Alias in the protocol
Next by thread: RE: iSCSI: Support Alias in the protocol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:03:57 2001
6315 messages in chronological order