|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI Login ProposalTrang, Nothing is "official" until this does not become a RFC. But I did not hear any complaints about NOP. As for the Login/Text - I've just put them out. Too early to tell how many minor/major changes will be proposed. Give people a chance to look through them. Julo "Trang Nguyen" <tnguyen@perfisans.com> on 22-08-2001 16:50:50 Please respond to <tnguyen@perfisans.com> To: "BURBRIDGE,MATTHEW \(HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2\)" <matthew_burbridge@hp.com>, Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu> Subject: RE: iSCSI Login Proposal Hi Julian, So far I've seen there are two iSCSI changes (Login/ Text commands and Nop-in/out commands). Are they official changes? I mean can we use them now? Thanks, Trang -----Original Message----- From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of BURBRIDGE,MATTHEW (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2) Sent: August 22, 2001 5:07 AM To: 'Julian Satran' Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: RE: iSCSI Login Proposal Hi Julian, I was aware of the proposed change (I actually voted for it in London). I thought of staying with SecurityContextComplete for the time being as it is nearer the current spec. I am happy to go either way. Personally I prefer the put the status in the text command/response (For the new proposal its not needed in the login command/response). The login proposal has an additional state ("Pre-security state") which would need to be reflected in your proposal. Is there value is specifying a login state machine in the spec? I am happy to do this (I have written one any way) but did not include it in the proposal for simplicity's sake. Cheers Matthew -----Original Message----- From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:49 AM To: BURBRIDGE,MATTHEW (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2) Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re:iSCSI Login Proposal Matthew, Apologies to you, Marjorie and Bob for "changing the rules" during the game. I thought that it was obvious that I am going to rewrite 4 and simplify the rules by neatly staging the login phase through a binary type indicator that should show where the command is. Although I was myself not very thrilled by the idea (presented in London) the meeting ended with a consensus that I should explore this and that is what I did. The result is not bad (the stages a clearly delineated, there are fewer handshakes than before etc.). Regards, Julo
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:03:57 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |