SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    iSCSI: error recovery striation for rev08 (Was: iSCSI - open issues - no discussion - recovery levels)



    >- on the recovery there is consesus that it is a good idea; there is no
    >consensus on how many layers to enforce (I think that 2 - all or nothing is
    >a good choice).
    
    I am sure Julian is trying to kick off a discussion here, after 
    collaborating with me on the London proposals  :-)
    
    Seriously, Julian and I were both hoping for more comments before
    rev08 in this area - which I haven't seen too many of.
    
    Let me state for the record (as I already said in London) that 
    all-or-nothing is not to my favor - IMHO, that erects a too steep 
    barrier between the two levels.
    
    I however can see the case for considering decreasing the number 
    of levels.  Allow me sometime for cogitation on this once rev08 
    is published.  I hope to post an alternative scheme of striation 
    by the end of next week for WG consideration.  For rev08, current 
    plan is to capture what was presented in London, but state clearly
    that this area is still under debate.
    
    Thanks.
    --
    Mallikarjun 
    
    
    Mallikarjun Chadalapaka
    Networked Storage Architecture
    Network Storage Solutions Organization
    MS 5668	Hewlett-Packard, Roseville.
    cbm@rose.hp.com
    
    
    >Dear colleagues,
    >
    >Considering that the next plugfest is getting close and we would like to
    >have
    >version 08 ready for it.
    >
    >We have two open items that got little attention on the list up to now:
    >
    >- taking out the markers and inserting a reference to an external framing
    >draft (what is mandatory, what is optional etc.)
    >- recovery the recovery levels proposal
    >
    >The status  with both is as follows:
    >
    >- on the framing there is consensus that it is a good idea; there is no
    >consensus on what is  MUST, SHOULD etc.
    >- on the recovery there is consesus that it is a good idea; there is no
    >consensus on how many layers to enforce (I think that 2 - all or nothing is
    >a good choice).
    >
    >Regards,
    >Julo
    >
    >
    >
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 12:17:10 2001
6328 messages in chronological order