|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iscsi Rev 7.93 : text cmd & bookmarks.I could be missing something, but I am not sure why do we have TTT in text cmd/rsp if there MUST be only one outstanding text cmd per connection. Text command lookup implies to me more than one outstanding cmd, but that would be a protocol error. -Ayman > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of > Santosh Rao > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:26 PM > To: IPS Reflector > Subject: iscsi Rev 7.93 : text cmd & bookmarks. > > > Hi Julian, > > Thanks for adding the target transfer tag field to the text command > & text response. This allows for simpler indexing for targets without > having to special case the text message lookups. > > Also, as you've observed and incorporated, the target transfer tag field > itself serves as a bookmark and so, the bookmark field has been removed. > > One question remains however. Since the target transfer tag field serves > as a bookmark and a TTT of 0xFFFFFFFF serves as an indication that this > is a new text command (i.e. no bookmark present), of what value add is > the bookmark bit ? Why not remove the bookmark bit itself and only use > the TTT ? > > Keeping both the bookmark bit and the TTT is providing 2 ways of > indicating a new text cmd. I would be in favor of removal of the > bookmark bit. > > Regards, > Santosh >
Home Last updated: Mon Sep 17 18:17:12 2001 6563 messages in chronological order |