SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iscsi Rev 7.93 : text cmd & bookmarks.



    I could be missing something, but I am not sure why do we have TTT in text
    cmd/rsp if there MUST be only one outstanding text cmd per connection. Text
    command lookup implies to me more than one outstanding cmd, but that would
    be a protocol error.
    
    -Ayman
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
    > Santosh Rao
    > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:26 PM
    > To: IPS Reflector
    > Subject: iscsi Rev 7.93 : text cmd & bookmarks.
    >
    >
    > Hi Julian,
    >
    > Thanks for adding the target transfer tag field to the text command
    > & text response. This allows for simpler indexing for targets without
    > having to special case the text message lookups.
    >
    > Also, as you've observed and incorporated, the target transfer tag field
    > itself serves as a bookmark and so, the bookmark field has been removed.
    >
    > One question remains however. Since the target transfer tag field serves
    > as a bookmark and a TTT of 0xFFFFFFFF serves as an indication that this
    > is a new text command (i.e. no bookmark present), of what value add is
    > the bookmark bit ? Why not remove the bookmark bit itself and only use
    > the TTT ?
    >
    > Keeping both the bookmark bit and the TTT is providing 2 ways of
    > indicating a new text cmd. I would be in favor of removal of the
    > bookmark bit.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Santosh
    >
    
    


Home

Last updated: Mon Sep 17 18:17:12 2001
6563 messages in chronological order