|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: ISCSI: question about text command dataYes. The spec should specifically state that there has to 'exactly one NULL character'. Deva Adaptec -----Original Message----- From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1) Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:11 AM To: 'Steve Senum'; ietf-ips Subject: RE: ISCSI: question about text command data I disagree. There is no reason why the spec shouldn't be very specific about what behavior to take. In the interest of simplicity, the spec should state 'exactly one null character' as Mark and Buck request. If people follow the spec, there won't be a need to invoke costly error response. Paul -----Original Message----- From: Steve Senum [mailto:ssenum@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 8:27 AM To: ietf-ips Subject: Re: ISCSI: question about text command data Mark, I agree with Julian on this issue. Steve Senum Mark Bakke wrote: > > Julian- > > Wouldn't it be simpler to just say "exactly one". The last > part of Buck's question mentioned that he didn't see why > anyone would want more than one, and nobody responded saying > they did. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > Julian Satran wrote: > > > > I've changed it the text to "at least one" to avoid errors hard to list. > > > > Julo > > > > "Buck Landry" <blandry@Crossroads.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 13-09-2001 01:25:36 > > > > Please respond to "Buck Landry" <blandry@Crossroads.com> > > > > Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu > > > > To: <ips@ece.cmu.edu> > > cc: > > Subject: ISCSI: question about text command data > > > > I have a small question about what separates the "key=value" pairs in > > the data segment of an iscsi text command. On pg. 78 of the iscsi v7-90 > > draft (2.10.5), it states: > > > > >>> > > Every key=value pair (including the last or only pair) MUST be followed > > by null (0x00) delimiter. > > <<< > > > > The question: is it legal to have *more* than one null char between > > key=value pairs? (no, I don't know why anybody would particularly want > > to do this.) > > > > Thanks, > > buck > > -- > Mark A. Bakke > Cisco Systems > mbakke@cisco.com > 763.398.1054
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 18 15:17:13 2001 6579 messages in chronological order |