|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re:iSCSI: ImmediateData Text Parameter NegotiationI would rather change the InitialR2T to no bu there a dealock avoidance rule is in force. Julo "Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 18-09-2001 22:30:12 Please respond to cbm@rose.hp.com Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu To: "BURBRIDGE,MATTHEW (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2)" <matthew_burbridge@hp.com> cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re:iSCSI: ImmediateData Text Parameter Negotiation Matthew, I completely agree that the default should be "no"! I pointed this out sometime ago myself. Apart from what you point out, the default setting for "ImmediateData" seems to be at variance with the conservative default for "InitialR2T" ("yes"). Julian, could you please consider this request? Regards. -- Mallikarjun Mallikarjun Chadalapaka Networked Storage Architecture Network Storage Solutions Organization MS 5668 Hewlett-Packard, Roseville. cbm@rose.hp.com "BURBRIDGE,MATTHEW (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2)" wrote: > > Julian, > > Appendix D24 (ImmediateData) does not describe the result of negotiation if > the two sides differ. I presume that since the default is "yes", then only > if both sides agree to "no" is immediate data turned off. Please can this > be stated. > > Additionally, I feel that the default value for ImmediateData should be > "no". > > Similarly, there is no statement on MaxOutstandingR2T. Presumable the > minimum is selected. > > Matthew Burbridge > Senior Development Engineer > NIS-Bristol > Hewlett Packard > Telnet: 312 7010 > E-mail: matthewb@bri.hp.com >
Home Last updated: Wed Sep 19 10:17:27 2001 6596 messages in chronological order |