|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Data Digest Error questionYes there is a typo (the second appearance is yes). However the function is correctly stated as OR i.e. the result is yes if at least one of them wants order (it requires both to agree to say no). Julo
"Mallikarjun C." wrote: > > Prasenjit, > > The Reject mechanism is intended to be uniformly applicable to > all (recovery-savvy and otherwise) targets. > > Recovery R2T, OTOH, is only for ErrorRecoveryLevel>=1 capable > implementations (DataSequenceInOrder=true Sorry, that was supposed to be DataSequenceInOrder=no. Also, it appears to me that the result function for this key should be AND, and there's a typo in the description - it says "no" for both cases. Julian, comments? >as well, I think this > needs to be called out in its description), since a recovery R2T > implies going back in the data stream. > > The delivery subsystem failure status is the final termination > status (even though there were several good data PDUs after the > failed one) for ErrorRecoveryLevel=0 implementations, sent after > waiting for the F-bit. > > Hope that helps. > > Regards. > -- > Mallikarjun > > Mallikarjun Chadalapaka > Networked Storage Architecture > Network Storage Solutions Organization > MS 5668 Hewlett-Packard, Roseville. > cbm@rose.hp.com > > Prasenjit Sarkar wrote: > > > > This question relates to how the target handles data digest errors for data > > pdus. > > > > The spec says the target has to send a reject pdu with the attached pdu > > header > > + (recovery R2T OR delivery subsystem failure status) > > > > Why do we need two mechanisms? Wouldnt the pdu header indicate what needed > > to be transmitted? Maybe a word of motivation might help. > > > > Prasenjit Sarkar > > Research Staff Member > > IBM Almaden Research > > San Jose -- Mallikarjun Mallikarjun Chadalapaka Networked Storage Architecture Network Storage Solutions Organization MS 5668 Hewlett-Packard, Roseville. cbm@rose.hp.com
Home Last updated: Fri Oct 05 14:17:24 2001 7076 messages in chronological order |