RE: iscsi - InitiatorName key during login

["KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <marjorie_krueger@hp.com>]

In any implementation, there may be a separation between authentication and
authorization.

I admit insufficient data WRT iSCSI security draft, but I am assuming that
regardless what authentication scheme is in use, an implementation may or
may not have some association between authentication "userId" and an
initiator access control list consisting of InitiatorNames.  So even if an
initiator is "authenticated", this InitiatorName may not be allowed access
to this target?  The earlier list discussion seemed to indicate "userId" is
separate from "InitiatorName"

For instance, IPSec authenticates based on IP address.  But there is no
requirement that there be a one-one association between an IP address and an
InitiatorName, so while the IP address may authenticate, the InitiatorName
may not be allowed access to the target.  

Perhaps on a connection joining a session, it is enough that the connection
knows the correct ISID, TSID?  But I am thinking that requiring the correct
InitiatorName is a small price to pay for an added check.  ISID=1, TSID=1 is
easy to "guess", but correct InitiatorName is not.

Please correct me if you see a flaw in my thinking...

Marjorie  
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 2:10 PM
To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: RE: iscsi - InitiatorName key during login



You are the naming team so you must be right!  The current authentication
schemes do not make specific use of the InitiatorName but some
authentication has to be used. What makes InitiaatorName needed that you did
consider earlier? 

Julo 


John Hufferd@IBMUS 
08-10-01 22:36 

        To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL@IBMDE, "KRUEGER,MARJORIE
(HP-Roseville,ex1)" <marjorie_krueger@hp.com>, andy@windriver.com] 
        cc:        ips@ece.cmu.edu 
        From:        John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS 
        Subject:        RE: iscsi - InitiatorName key during loginLink 
  






Marjorie is correct.  Without the Initiator Name on all Logins  a Secondary
Connection can spoof its way in.  The appendix needs to be corrected.

.
.
.
John L. Hufferd
Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
Home Office (408) 997-6136
Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com

Sent by:        owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu 
To:        ips@ece.cmu.edu 
cc:         
Subject:        RE: iscsi - InitiatorName key during login 



I would think InitiatorName is required on the first login PDU of every
connection - InitiatorName is required for target authentication of the
initiator, and that happens each time a connection joins the session.  To
behave otherwise seems an opportunity for identity spoofing?

In any case, this needs to be clarified in the next revision...

Marjorie Krueger
Networked Storage Architecture
Networked Storage Solutions Org.
Hewlett-Packard
tel: +1 916 785 2656
fax: +1 916 785 0391
email: marjorie_krueger@hp.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: andy currid [mailto:andy@windriver.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 9:34 AM
> To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject: iscsi - InitiatorName key during login
>
>
>
> iSCSI version 8 is unclear as to whether InitiatorName is required
> in the first login PDU of every login in a session, or just the
> leading login.
>
> Chapter 5, Login Phase, states -
>
>  "The login phase sequence of commands and responses proceeds
> as follows:
>
>    - login initial request
>    - login partial response (optional)
>    - more login requests and responses (optional)
>    - login final-response (mandatory)
>
>   The initial login request MUST include the InitiatorName and
>   SessionType key=value pairs."
>
> Taken in the context, this wording implies that for any login, the
> first login PDU must contain the InitiatorName key.
>
> Appendix D.13, InitiatorName, states that InitiatorName is Leading
> Only and that "this key MUST be provided by the initiator of the TCP
> connection to the remote endpoint before the end of the login phase".
>
> This wording implies that InitiatorName is supplied in the leading
> login only, and need not necessrily appear in the first login PDU
> of the leading login.
>
> So which is correct?
>
> It seems to me that requiring that InitiatorName be present in the
> first PDU of the leading login is a must, to allow targets to verify
> up front whether or not they wish to proceed further with this
> initiator. I don't think there's much incremental benefit to having
> InitiatorName appear in the first login PDU of every login.
>
> Andy
> --
> Andy Currid                                       andy@windriver.com
> Server Products Group                       http://www.windriver.com
> Wind River Networks                         Phone : (1) 510 749 2191
> 500 Wind River Way, Alameda, CA 94501       Fax   : (1) 510 749 2560
>