SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI - TTT in negotiations



    From context - the same as on a long negotiation. F 0 indicates that 
    target hasn't finished - the context indicates what.
    
    Julo
    
    
    
    
    "Deva-Adaptec" <deva@platys.com>
    10-10-01 19:15
    Please respond to "Deva-Adaptec"
    
     
            To:     Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
            cc: 
            Subject:        RE: iSCSI - TTT in negotiations
    
     
    
    Julian,
     
    If it is being done for general purpose also, how will the initiator know 
    if a target has a long text to send and wait for it, when F bit is zero? 
    Am I missing something?
     
     
    Deva
    Adaptec
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of Julian Satran
    Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:17 AM
    To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject: Re: iSCSI - TTT in negotiations
    
    
    Bookmarks (TTT) are not mandated for a a general purpose negotiation (a 
    sequence of text request responses). We created it for long responses 
    mainly (SendTargets and futures).. 
    
    What we are proposing now is to mandate it for every request/response that 
    has F=0 and use it to reset/time-out 
    a negotiation in general. 
    
    Julo 
    
    
    
    Santosh Rao <santoshr@cup.hp.com> 
    Sent by: santoshr@cup.hp.com 
    10-10-01 18:05 
    Please respond to Santosh Rao 
            
            To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL 
            cc:        ips@ece.cmu.edu 
            Subject:        Re: iSCSI - TTT in negotiations 
    
     
    
    
    Julian,
    
    I thought we already had the below mechanism in place since 7.9x and TTT
    in text cmd/rsp had already replaced the bookmark mechanisms.
    
    What, then, is being proposed below ??
    
    - Santosh
    
    
    Julian Satran wrote:
    > 
    > Dear colleagues,
    > 
    > It occurred to us that we may want to have a simple (more regular) way
    > to "index" at target into ongoing text negotiations (not login) and we
    > may want the target to be able to set it's TTT whenever the F bit is
    > not 0 and to mandate the initiator to copy it in the next text command
    > in the chain.  This might make bookmarks and long negotiations behave
    > similarly (and time-out,/ be reset similarly).
    > 
    > Comments?
    > 
    > Julo
    
    -- 
    ##################################
    Santosh Rao
    Software Design Engineer,
    HP-UX iSCSI Driver Team,
    Hewlett Packard, Cupertino.
    email : santoshr@cup.hp.com
    Phone : 408-447-3751
    ##################################
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Wed Oct 10 19:17:33 2001
7184 messages in chronological order