|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI minimum PDU lengthno - the minimum mentioned includes only the data segment. Julo Santosh Rao <santoshr@cup.hp.com> Sent by: santoshr@cup.hp.com 24-10-01 22:52 Please respond to Santosh Rao To: "Martin, Nick" <Nick.Martin@compaq.com> cc: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: iSCSI minimum PDU length Does the MaxRecvPDULength include the AHS length ? - Santosh "Martin, Nick" wrote: > > Julian, > > This is for the data after the PDU header right? > This will be the guaranteed lowest value anyone will be forced to deal > with. > Implementations may negotiate for any value greater than or equal to > this value. > > This is acceptable and it is a good choice because it is the largest > power of 2 that will fit within minimum Ethernet MTU of ~1500 and leaves > plenty of room for iSCSI and LLP headers. > > Thanks, > Nick > > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 12:35 PM > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: iSCSI minimum PDU length > > With no votes against we have settled (again) on single PDU length (per > connection, per direction) for all types of PDUs. > But I think we erred on the low side by suggesting 64 as a minimum. It > is > low (it was mentioned) and bad for text request/response. > > How about settling for 1024? > > Julo -- ################################## Santosh Rao Software Design Engineer, HP-UX iSCSI Driver Team, Hewlett Packard, Cupertino. email : santoshr@cup.hp.com Phone : 408-447-3751 ##################################
Home Last updated: Thu Oct 25 03:17:44 2001 7380 messages in chronological order |