|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI minimum PDU lengthWe are attempting to make it a uniform limit for the DataSegment for all PDUs (Data, Login, Text, NOP etc.). Julo John Hufferd@IBMUS 25-10-01 11:35 To: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL@IBMDE cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu From: John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS Subject: Re: iSCSI minimum PDU length If you are only talking about Data PDUs, then at least I understand. . . . John L. Hufferd Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) IBM/SSG San Jose Ca Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403, eFax: (408) 904-4688 Home Office (408) 997-6136 Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com ---------------------- Forwarded by John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM on 10/25/2001 02:34 AM --------------------------- Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu To: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: iSCSI minimum PDU length Julian, Perhaps I do not understand what you are getting at here, but since there will be implementations with only R2T type Sessions, then there should be a lot of PDUs that just carry the Command (48 bytes + digest) it seems that a 1024 is kind of big. What am I missing? . . . John L. Hufferd Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) IBM/SSG San Jose Ca Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403, eFax: (408) 904-4688 Home Office (408) 997-6136 Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL@ece.cmu.edu on 10/24/2001 10:34:38 AM Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu To: ips@ece.cmu.edu cc: Subject: iSCSI minimum PDU length With no votes against we have settled (again) on single PDU length (per connection, per direction) for all types of PDUs. But I think we erred on the low side by suggesting 64 as a minimum. It is low (it was mentioned) and bad for text request/response. How about settling for 1024? Julo
Home Last updated: Sun Oct 28 02:17:47 2001 7430 messages in chronological order |