Re: iSCSI: current UNH Plugfest

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

Good point - Julo




Steve Senum <ssenum@cisco.com>
Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
30-10-01 21:05
Please respond to Steve Senum

 
        To:     ietf-ips <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: iSCSI: current UNH Plugfest

 

Julian,

Julian Satran wrote:

> For numerical and single literal negotiations, the responding party MUST
> respond with the required key and the value it selects, based on the
> selection rule specific to the key, becomes the negotiation result.  If 
a
> key is irrelevant in the current negotiation, the responder may use the
> special numeric constant 0r.
> Selection of a value not admissible under the selection rules is
> considered a protocol error and handled accordingly.

I don't see the point or using '0r' instead of
'irrelevant' like the list and boolean types do.
Even numeric types have to check for 'NotUnderstood',
a decidedly non numeric value.

Steve Senum