|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI over TLSPeter, A group of us seriously considered TLS. The main reason for dropping it was that it would interfere with any mechanism we could think of doing framing and steering and we thought that framing and steering are essential at 10Gbps and over. Julo "Peter Mellquist" <peterm@seven-systems.com> Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu 07-11-01 02:15 Please respond to "Peter Mellquist" To: <ips@ece.cmu.edu> cc: Subject: iSCSI over TLS I am aware that the ips group is leaning toward IPSEC as for the security solution but I am interested if anyone is also considering using Transport Layer Security (TLS)? I am concerned that the requirement for IPSEC might make TOEs more complex than they need to be. Can TLS be optionally used as well as defined by the specification? This could allow TOE vendors to only be concerned with providing normal IPv4 / ipv6 and leave the security to a higher layer. A TLS stack sitting above the TOE could then handle security very well. Also, I anticipate that the first generation of TOEs will not support IPSEC. With a iSCSI/TLS we could enable security solutions with the first generation of TOEs and get speed and security. Are any TOE vendors planning to support IPSEC? Can TLS or IPSEC be supported? -peter Peter Mellquist Seven Systems Technologies 575 Menlo Drive Suite 2 Rocklin CA 916-577-1275 peterm@seven-systems.com
Home Last updated: Thu Nov 08 15:17:37 2001 7655 messages in chronological order |