|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: FCencap: Missing SOF/EOF charactersRalph: Missed Class F in the slippery slopes of the wonderful world of FC Classes! -Murali -----Original Message----- From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of Ralph Weber Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:49 AM To: IPS Reflector Cc: Murali Rajagopal; Franco Travostino Subject: Re: FCencap: Missing SOF/EOF characters Murali, Franco, I thank you both for pointing out just how slippery a slope this is. Until receiving your e-mail messages I had been under the misimpression that Class F was an important part of the FCIP mission. :-) Vague may be vague but it also is not unnecessarily constraining. All the best. Ralph... Murali Rajagopal wrote: > How about stating something that we do support in the Scope section: > > "This document only considers encapsulation for only FC Classes 2 and 3." > > -Murali > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of Franco Travostino > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:31 AM > To: ENDL_TX@computer.org; IPS Reflector > Subject: Re: FCencap: Missing SOF/EOF characters > > At 12:54 PM 11/6/2001, Ralph Weber wrote: > >> "This document describes common mechanisms for the transport >> of Fibre Channel frames over an IP network within the limitations >> of service provided by an IP network. The topics described in >> this document include the encapsulation format and a mechanism >> for enforcing the Fibre Channel frame lifetime limits." > > > This proposed text comes a tad closer, but it's cryptic still. > > >> I am NOT willing to discuss Fibre Channel Classes in the draft >> because to do so would require adding a definition of the term. >> Fibre Channel Classes are not discussed in the draft as it is >> currently written. > > > I agree that a definition/discussion would be way inappropriate here. > A T11 citation should do the trick instead. We already have a sentence > like "The format and content of an FC frame is described in the FC > standards (e.g., FC-FS [3], FC-SW-2 [4], and FC-PI [5])." I don't see > a problem with writing "Scope is limited to FC Class 2 and 3, which > are described in the FC standard ([x]), and then adding [x] and the > authoritative T11 document to Section 7 References. This direct and > simple. > > -franco
Home Last updated: Wed Nov 07 13:17:38 2001 7616 messages in chronological order |