|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iFCP: iFCP -06 commentsDavid: > -----Original Message----- > From: Black_David@emc.com [mailto:Black_David@emc.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:19 AM > To: cmonia@NishanSystems.com > Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: RE: iFCP: iFCP -06 comments > <stuff deleted> > > > > 10.4 b) What happens when the broadcast frame exceeds the > MTU size? > This > > > seems to result in a rather unreliable broadcast service, > as all of the > UDP > > > datagrams could well be dropped, consistently and > repeatedly for large > > > enough broadcast frames. > > > > We will rewrite the section to: > > > > a) Specify the use of source fragmentation if the datagram > exceeds the > PMTU. > > Details will need to be supplied, as the large FC frame is > being fragmented > into UDP datagrams, and hence the UDP datagrams each need to contain > information about how to reassemble them into an FC frame We had intended to use IP datagram fragmentation (this should have been mentioned explicitly, I guess). What more do we need to specify in the way of a fragmentation and reassembly mechanism? Charles
Home Last updated: Tue Nov 20 19:17:40 2001 7862 messages in chronological order |