|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI: Byte1 Bit 7 Seems Not to be reservedIf it is reserved then that means "today I don't know the meaning" but if that is the case, why not make it 0? If it is a "1" for a reason, then it would not fit the meaning of "reserved" (would it?). Draft 7 said bit 7 is a 1 and bits 5-6 were reserved. Wouldn't that be less controversial than saying a "1" is a reserved bit? Maybe I am missing something. Eddy -----Original Message----- From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:04 PM To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: iSCSI: Byte1 Bit 7 Seems Not to be reserved John, If you are referring to the fact that a reserved bit has to be 0 - that is not so. The statement about reserved is that they are 0 unless explicitly said otherwise. There are some other reserved positions that are set to 1. Julo John Hufferd@IBMUS 14-12-01 10:24 To: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL@IBMDE cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: iSCSI: Byte1 Bit 7 Seems Not to be reserved Julian, in Draft 9, the SCSI Response PDU picture shows Byte 1 Bit 7 (normally the Final Flag) to be set to 1. Yet the Text that follows the picture says that Byte 1 Bit 7 -5 is reserved. We should probably make those consistent. I think you meant to indicate that the Response was the only PDU associated with this action, so I think you need to mark only Byte 1 bit 6-5 as reserved. . . . John L. Hufferd Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) IBM/SSG San Jose Ca Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403, eFax: (408) 904-4688 Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702 Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com
Home Last updated: Fri Dec 14 19:17:45 2001 8077 messages in chronological order |