SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    FCIP: 12/19 Teleconference Minutes



    Minutes submitted by Kha Sin Teow, Brocade
    
    Roll call:
    
    Andy
    Neil,
    Ralph
    elizabeth,
    jim nelson
    raj
    anil
    ken hirata,
    milan merhar,
    brett ketcham, cnt
    venkat,
    dave peterson
    khasin
    bill krieg
    don fraser
    
    Agenda
    ------
    - SF Security
    -Model
    -draft comments
    
    1) Security - short frame
    - D. Black's response - ok if the nonce is 64-bit as mentioned in Ralph's
    write-up. But he (David) reserved the right to review the detailed
    description.
    
    2) IESG Plenary Report from Elizabeth
      - one person expressed a very strong objection to the principle of design
    team (authors)
    
      - another comment about should be single author; no long author list
    
    3) Comments to the latest docs - deadline
    
      - FC-BB meeting is in 1st week of Feb last call of FC-IP cannot proceed
    until until BB approval (plenary)
    
      - why is this an issue since Annex E has at least 12-13 items that are NOT
    completely stable? (Venkat)
    
      - Murali pointed out that the procedure is that BB-2 needs to be approved
    during the BB meeting; not outside
    
     -  If  IPS Chairs has issues with BB-2 not procedurally approved the short
    frame proposal just yet and not pass the last call, we   should try to go
    with the last call.
    
    4)  Model - (Andy) model that Murali sent on on Dec 19 afternoon
    
    - Andy objects to the model of suggesting that there is one VE_Port to
    multi-link to another VE_POrt (not consistent with Fig 4 of the fcip draft);
    the intent of the model is not to imply that (Venkat and Ralph and Murali);
    so maybe the model should be changed editorially or some verbage be added to
    BB; so andy is ok with it then other then editorial mod. VE_Port and LEP -
    one to one
    
    - Anil: draft makes no mention of mutliple fcip entity pairs - Ralph is
    leary about adding more varbage;
    
    - Murali will post the model to the T11 reflector since there has been no
    visibility since Austin
    
    - 598v2 - show BPort and E_Port interaction also deal with talk to VE_Port.
    Need to understand B_Port. FCIP doesn't talk  about  B_port and E_Port.; no
    need to - that's FC entities problem and the intelligence behind which is
    covered in BB
    
    5) comments on the draft
    
     - figure 5: need to add text about the "bundling" of the 3 tcp connections.
    
    - Murali: need to state/explain about multiple fcip links between multiple
    pairs of fcip entities; Ralph to come up with something in 5.2.
    
    -  Anil: left over about IP address - to be replace with "FC-IP Identifier"
    do we need FC-IP Identifier?
    
    -Bob Snively to explain why the Id is necessary; also why the short frame -
    src has wwpn and fcip-id but dest don't have the fcip-id. would WWPN be
    sufficient?
    
     - Don will review all occurances of "close the (TCP) connection" and
    determine if it is appropropriate to add a phrase similar to "close and
    report back to the FC fabric". This is to keep the FCIP work in line with
    proposed changes to FC-BB-2 that will require notification from a gateawy on
    loss of the intersite linl.
    
    - suggestion to delete (6) from section 4.
    
    
    6) Next Meeting: Jan 2/2002 - next meeting - to be hosted by Don
    
    


Home

Last updated: Sat Dec 22 04:17:44 2001
8195 messages in chronological order