SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iScsi:



    
    I think you need to understand how SCSI on Shared Devices work.  If you do
    not coordinate either via a Shared File System or Shared Data Base, or SCSI
    Reserves, you clearly have a problem.  But this is a well known issue and
    has been solved years ago with multiple SCSI Bus connections to the same
    Storage Controller, and currently applies to Fiber Channel as well as
    iSCSI.  Nothing new is needed in the iSCSI protocol.
    
    .
    .
    .
    John L. Hufferd
    Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
    IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
    Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
    Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702
    Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com
    
    
    Nitin Dhingra <nitin.dhingra@dcmtech.co.in>@ece.cmu.edu on 01/02/2002
    09:06:50 PM
    
    Sent by:    owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    
    
    To:    "'Black_David@emc.com'" <Black_David@emc.com>, ips@ece.cmu.edu
    cc:
    Subject:    RE: iScsi:
    
    
    
    Well, let's take a case
    where you have one target and many initiators connected that target
    
    And as iScsi is at block level, so if more than one initiator have
    requested
    to write at the same block address at the same time at the same target
    this can create synchronization problems, don't you think?
    
    Shouldn't you give an option like most other protocols like NFS does,
    where you have a separate optional layer for locking/synchronization...
    
    Don't you think this should be handled by iScsi??
    
    - Nitin
    
     -----Original Message-----
    From:       Black_David@emc.com [mailto:Black_David@emc.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:10 PM
    To:   nitin.dhingra@dcmtech.co.in; ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject:    RE: iScsi:
    
    I don't understand this - what exactly is broken that you think
    needs to be fixed?  Many SCSI targets do implement access controls
    at the logical unit level, which is in T10's domain, not iSCSI's.
    
    --David
    
    ---------------------------------------------------
    David L. Black, Senior Technologist
    EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
    +1 (508) 249-6449 *NEW*      FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500
    black_david@emc.com         Cell: +1 (978) 394-7754
    ---------------------------------------------------
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Nitin Dhingra [mailto:nitin.dhingra@dcmtech.co.in]
    > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:40 AM
    > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > Subject: iScsi:
    >
    >
    > Why don't you put a restriction on the read/write access to a target?
    > This can solve some of the synchronization problems that can occur...
    >
    > And Yeah Happy New Year to All...
    >
    > - Nitin
    >
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Thu Jan 03 12:18:16 2002
8268 messages in chronological order