Maybe I
don’t understand the sentence. I interpret it to mean that if the default value
is acceptable to me then not offering it is somehow different than the default …
and that confuses me (well, actually it makes me wonder if the sentence is
trying to say something else).
I think I
get it … the default for MaxConnections is 1. If I offer MaxConnections=1 (the
default) then the target can’t negotiate for more connections even though I
could have supported more connections. Is that what you are trying to say?
It is
probably just me but is there a clearer way to convey what you are trying to
say?
Eddy
-----Original
Message-----
From: Julian Satran
[mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002
2:00 PM
To: Eddy Quicksall
Cc: ips@ece. cmu. edu (E-mail)
Subject: Re: iSCSI: not offering a
key
To keep the negotiation stateless -
Julo
|
|
Eddy
Quicksall <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>
25-01-02 17:08
|
To: "ips@ece. cmu. edu (E-mail)"
<ips@ece.cmu.edu>
cc: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
Subject: iSCSI: not offering a key
|
The spec says:
Not offering a
key for negotiation is not
equivalent to
offering the current (or default) value.
Does anyone know why?
Eddy
