SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: One Node or Two?



    David-
    
    The "or" is meant to be a non-exclusive or.  An iSCSI Node can
    be both an initiator and a target, and have the same iSCSI name
    for both.  See draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-name-disc-04:
               
    >           2. iSCSI Names 
    >               
    >                 The main addressable, discoverable entity in iSCSI is an iSCSI 
    >                 Node.  An iSCSI node can be either an initiator, a target, or 
    >                 both. 
    
    I agree that we should fix up the wording in the iSCSI draft to
    clarify this.  How about changing:
    
    Section 1. Definitions:
    >         - iSCSI Name: The name of an iSCSI initiator or iSCSI target.  
    
    To:
    
            - iSCSI Name: The name of an iSCSI node, which can be an iSCSI
              initiator, target, or both.
    
    2.5.1 iSCSI Architecture Model
    >                 b) iSCSI Node - The iSCSI Node represents a single iSCSI 
    >                 initiator or iSCSI target.  There are one or more iSCSI 
    >                 Nodes within a Network Entity.
    
    To:
    
                    b) iSCSI Node - The iSCSI Node represents a single iSCSI 
                    initiator and/or iSCSI target.  An iSCSI Node can be both
                    and initiator and a target.  There are one or more iSCSI 
                    Nodes within a Network Entity. 
    
    
    I think that these two changes should clear this up.
    
    --
    Mark
    
    
    David Dillard wrote:
    > 
    > As defined in the latest draft an iSCSI Node "... represents a single iSCSI
    > initiator or iSCSI target."
    > 
    > By this definition an LU that acts as both an initiator and a target, such
    > as a data mover for extended copy, is two iSCSI nodes.  This LU will have
    > two iSCSI names, one for the initiator side of the LU and one for the
    > target.  Therefore, there will be two  iSNS "entries" for this LU.
    > 
    > My question is: Is this intended?
    > 
    > Regards,
    > 
    > David
    
    -- 
    Mark A. Bakke
    Cisco Systems
    mbakke@cisco.com
    763.398.1054
    


Home

Last updated: Mon Jan 28 13:17:57 2002
8517 messages in chronological order