|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI: Boolean value (yes, no) negotiationSo that means, if the target needs to use ONLY immediate data, it has to fail the login because the initiator said NO to ImmediateData? thanks! -lakshmi -----Original Message----- From: Rahul Bhagwat [mailto:rahulb@veritas.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:07 AM To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian; ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: iSCSI: Boolean value (yes, no) negotiation I believe a key is not negotiated thrice as you have pointed out. That is a sender offers a value, receiver offers it's own and that's it. (I think specs has a mention that a key cannot be negotiated twice. This example falls into that category.) The result of the negotiation is key dependent. For example, in this particular key, when initiator sends ImmediateData=no, the negotiation is over as this is an AND function. However it is not an error to send back a response. In any case, the outcome of the result was decided for the initiator when it sent the key first and for the target when it received the key. Regards, Rahul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lakshmi Ramasubramanian" <nramas@windows.microsoft.com> To: <ips@ece.cmu.edu> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:56 PM Subject: iSCSI: Boolean value (yes, no) negotiation > Could someone please clarify Boolean key=value usage > (such as "ImmediateData=yes", etc)? > > For example, the initiator sends to target "ImmediateData=no". > But the target wants ImmediateData. So, it sends back > "ImmediateData=yes". > The initiator, being able to handle it, sends back "ImmediateData=no". > Now, they use immediate data in the PDUs. > > Is this valid? Or, in the above case if the target can't handle > non-immediate data it has to reject the login ? > > thanks! > -lakshmi >
Home Last updated: Wed Feb 06 14:17:57 2002 8682 messages in chronological order |