|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [iSCSI][Q+RFC] login response, tsidFrom an implementation point of view: 1. TSID is implicitly defined to be an unsigned 16-bit integer. TSID is only mentioned to be a ``tag'', ``null'', ``0'', ``1'', ``2'', ``entity'' and ``component''. [NDT] defines ISID, but not TSID. There need to be a definition of what kind of object TSID is. _That_ will define the operations which can be performed on it, not the other way around. iSCSIv10, 9.1.2 talks only about TSID namespace segregation, while a TSID object's definition is implicit. A word on TSID generation MAY be mentioned as well. 2. Login response PDU, status-class, status-detail. Wouldn't it be better to use one 16-bit unsigned integer for this information, call it ``status'' Then this ``status'' can be _logically_ split into ``class'' (8 MSb) and ``detail'' (8 LSb). But an implementation (HBA, software, etc) will use it as a 16-bit unsigned integer. Comments? -- Luben
Home Last updated: Sat Feb 16 13:18:14 2002 8773 messages in chronological order |