RE: iSCSI: key negotiation - Unrecognized value?

["KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <marjorie_krueger@hp.com>]

> When a value doesn't belong to the valid set of
> assignable values to a key, but is offered, 
> as Marjorie's example, shouldn't the following
> take place:
> 
> Originator-> MaxConnections=yes
> Responder->  MaxConnections=NotUnderstood

I believe that behavior is in error, as there must be a difference in the
response to an unrecognized key and an unrecognized "key value".
 
> Also, isn't ``Reject'' used for a valid, assignable
> value, but for which the responder has no resources:
> 
> Originator-> MaxConnections=4294967296
> Responder->  MaxConnections=Reject

Not as the spec is currently written.

I believe Robert Russell has recommended the correct solution - the current
draft doesn't specifically address the response when an invalid "key value"
is offered.

Marjorie