|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: key negotiation - Unrecognized value?Oh, sorry! I guess I pay too much attention on semantics (meaning), rather than just read what the draft says and try not to interpret it. Julian Satran wrote: > > Marjorie is correct - the text is (quite) explicit about requiring reject. > As for you example - the value to be answered by the target is the maximum acceptable - see the > rules for numeric negotiations. > > Julo > > Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com> > Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu To: "KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" > <marjorie_krueger@hp.com> > 20-02-02 22:21 cc: "Ips Reflector (E-mail)" > <ips@ece.cmu.edu>, Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL > Subject: Re: iSCSI: key negotiation - > Unrecognized value? > > > > "KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" wrote: > > > > What is the proper response if you recognize a key, but are offered a value > > that you don't recognize? For instance, what if MaxConnections=yes is > > offered? > > > > Where is that specified in the document? > > v10, pg 34, top: > > Any other key not understood by the responder may be ignored > by the responder without affecting the basic function. However, > the Text Response for a key not understood MUST be > key=NotUnderstood. > > v10, pg 33, middle: > > If a responder does not support or is not allowed to use > all of the offered options with a specific originator, > it may use the constant "Reject". > > Comments? > > -- > Luben Tuikov, Senior Software Engineer, Splentec Ltd. > Bus: +1-905-707-1954x112, 9-5 EST. Fax: +1-905-707-1974. -- Luben Tuikov, Senior Software Engineer, Splentec Ltd. Bus: +1-905-707-1954x112, 9-5 EST. Fax: +1-905-707-1974.
Home Last updated: Thu Feb 21 14:18:03 2002 8827 messages in chronological order |