|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: iscsi: version number in draft 11
Julian,
The problem
here is that I don't think the IESG regards them
as
arbitrary. Mark's message on this topic reveals the
underlying
issue
here:
>
BTW, there are paying customers that are buying and using >"ancient" iSCSI products that use
version 0.
Resetting the
version number gives vendors a very strong incentive to update those
products so that they'll interoperate. The IESG has little interest in
helping out folks who have shipped products based on Internet-Drafts
(see the boilerplate introduction to every draft), and to the extent
that this is the motivation for playing games with the version number,
we're going to get a very poor reception.
--David
--------------------------------------------------- David L.
Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA
01748 +1 (508) 249-6449 *NEW* FAX: +1 (508)
497-8500 black_david@emc.com
Cell: +1 (978)
394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------
David,
We could move to 10
when going RFC - version numbers are arbitrary anyhow.
Julo
| Black_David@emc.com
Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
28-02-02 01:13
| To:
rdr@io.iol.unh.edu, ips@ece.cmu.edu cc:
Subject: RE: iscsi: version
number in draft 11
|
Folks,
I've warned in the past that this use of version
numbers is going to cause problems, as it encourages the longevity of
obsolete implementations that don't interoperate. Version numbers
should NEVER have been used for identification of draft versions - in 20/20
hindsight a text key that could have been dropped from the final RFC would
have been better.
Prior guidance from the ADs has been that a version
number change from 0 to 1 in going to RFC would be ok. Let's reset
the version number to 0, and anyone still using something based on a draft
from back when the version number was still 0 has something truly ancient
and is
SOL.
Thanks, --David --------------------------------------------------- David
L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA
01748 +1 (508) 249-6449 *NEW* FAX: +1 (508)
497-8500 black_david@emc.com Cell: +1 (978)
394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------
>
-----Original Message----- > From: Robert D. Russell
[mailto:rdr@io.iol.unh.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:36
PM > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: iscsi: version number in draft
11 > > > Julian: > > The version number in
draft 10-94 is still 0x3, > the same as it was in draft 9 and draft
10. > > Would you please change it to 0x4 for draft 11. >
> Of course these numbers still need to be taken with > a grain
of salt, but testing is considerably > simpler and more robust when one
side identifies the > draft it intends to conform to in a manner that
can > be checked by the other side. > > Thanks, >
> Bob Russell > InterOperability Lab > University of New
Hampshire > rdr@iol.unh.edu > 603-862-3774 >
Home
Last updated: Thu Feb 28 11:18:08 2002
8929 messages in chronological order
|