SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI:reservations




    Elliott,

    Thanks. Unfortunately I have to send our text before the Friday call time (too close to the IETF deadline) so we will assume
    some outcome and adjust for the T10 decision later.

    Julo


    "Elliott, Robert" <Robert.Elliott@compaq.com>
    Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

    28-02-02 18:05

           
            To:        <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
            cc:        
            Subject:        RE: iSCSI:reservations

           



    -----Original Message-----
    From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
    Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:24 AM
    To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject: Re: iSCSI:reservations

    > We had long discussions on the reservation-clearing being
    > done (or not) at session close (FCP does this).
    >  We concluded that it is probably a thing that should be
    > handled at SCSI level (it would be wrong for the transport
    > to mes-up SCSI state) and perhaps we should only state that
    > an indication about session failure should be passed to
    > SCSI.  Mallikarjun and Randy have a set of good arguments
    > for not doing this implicitly that they would probably
    > want to share them with you.
    >
    > This is only a warning that this item in the clearing
    > appendix is going to change as this issue was debated
    > earlier on the list.
    >
    > Comments?

    T10 is going to discuss this issue on a Friday conference call for both
    iSCSI and SRP (InfiniBand) and should have a recommendation for you
    then.  Anyone interested is welcome to join the discussion.

    Here is the meeting announcement posted to the T10 mailing list:

    * From the T10 Reflector (t10@t10.org), posted by:
    * "Simpson, Cris" <cris.simpson@intel.com>
    *
    The SRP WG will discuss reservation issues for at least the first hour
    of
    this Friday's conference call. As the issues are of wide concern to the
    SCSI community, all interested parties are invited to participate.

    References:
    "Response to T10 Letter Ballot comments on SRP",
    Comment IBM050, Pages 37 and 104
    ftp://ftp.t10.org/t10/document.01/01-328r3.pdf
    Rob Elliott, "Clearing effects of logouts on different protocols",
    t10 mailing list, 21 Feb 2002,
    <78AF3C342AEAEF4BA33B35A8A15668C60296DB2C@cceexc17.americas.cpqcorp.net>
    Mallikarjun Chadalapaka, "Reservations & Nexus"
    ftp://ftp.t10.org/t10/document.02/02-078r0.pdf


    Conference call information:
    March 1 0900-1100 PST
    1.888.316.5901 or +1.617.801.9781
    If you are not an SRP 'regular', please send
    mail to mailto:cris.simpson@intel.com?subject=Mar_1_passcode for the
    passcode. (This will ensure that I schedule enough lines.)
    Cris

    ---
    Rob Elliott, Compaq Server Storage
    Robert.Elliott@compaq.com






Home

Last updated: Thu Feb 28 15:18:05 2002
8941 messages in chronological order