|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: iSCSI: Use of the A bit
By
status ack, if you mean a SCSI Response with ExpStatSN, then that does not
acknowledge the Data-In unless the Data-In was followed by
status.
Julian, all we are asking is that you don't create a
spec that has a pitfall. If one is worried about performance then he should work
that out by not asking for the Ack in the first place. Don't mandate it in the
spec, just say it in a note.
Eddy
That could be so but
it would be overkill. Status ACK can implicitly acknowledge the last
transfer. And Yes the fact that the
last transfer is not mentioned is an oversight that I will correct.
This does not mean that you HAVE TO raise the
A flag or that you are ENCOURAGED to do so :-)
Julo
| Paul Koning
<ni1d@arrl.net> Sent
by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
15-03-02 16:09 Please respond to Paul Koning
| To:
Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com cc:
rod.harrison@windriver.com, ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject:
RE: iSCSI: Use of the A bit
|
>>>>> "Eddy" == Eddy Quicksall
<Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com> writes:
Eddy> I think we may need
better explanation about why some folks Eddy> don't want to do the
"positive ack".
>> We got to this position, since so many folks
did not want to >> support the positive ack.
Something doesn't
compute here.
I don't believe the discussion has anything to do with
whether you support positive ACK or not. If you're doing error
recovery level 1 or above, then you are required to support it, because the
other end is allowed to say A=1 and you're required to answer
that.
If you don't want to support positive ACK, the solution is to
support only error recovery level 0.
The issue under discussion is
whether the rule "you are allowed to set A=1 only once per MaxBurstSize" is
correct. At this point it's clear to me that it is not, because you
need to be able to set A=1 at the end of the transfer. The current
rule forbids that unless the total transfer size is >=
MaxBurstSize.
Kevin's proposal is a simple fix to this
problem.
paul
Home
Last updated: Sat Mar 16 12:18:07 2002
9156 messages in chronological order
|