|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Bit numbering I-D nitI am getting serious flack from the Fibre Channel community over the bit numbering requirement in http://www.ietf.org/ID-nits.html. The problem is that Fibre Channel uses the other bit numbering scheme and interoperability woes seem certain unless something gets documented in the IETF RFCs. Everybody agrees that the body of the FC Frame Encapsulation and FCIP drafts can have the IETF bit numbering in the figures. What they all want is an appendix, or some such thing in the drafts/RFCs that translates it all back to the Fibre Channel view of reality. Such a thing seems destined to make waves in the IETF review process, and possibly even be a target for the RFC Editor's ax. Should I just jump of the top of the Hilton now, or is there a way out of this mess? Thanks. Ralph...
Home Last updated: Thu Mar 21 11:18:18 2002 9236 messages in chronological order |