|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE:Whatever is done, the parsing should be kept simple. Double characters and context sensitive parsing has not been necessary to date. Let's just move ahead with some unique (non overloaded) single character. Eddy -----Original Message----- From: Michel Maddux [mailto:Michel.Maddux@mcdata.com] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:36 AM To: 'iSCSI'; 'luben@splentec.com'; Rod Harrison Cc: Julian Satran Subject: RE: I disagree; a range of values has long been denoted by (..) ASCII being limited, using a minus (-) sign will get into character overloading and ambiguity. thanks ./m. -----Original Message----- From: Luben Tuikov [mailto:luben@splentec.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:53 PM To: Rod Harrison Cc: Julian Satran; ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: Rod Harrison wrote: > I would prefer one character. I don't care what it is, any character > will do, but having only one there is slightly easier to parse that > having two. I strongly agree. A single character, anyone indeed. Maybe a dash/minus ``-'' (0x2d). I don't think we'd ever need to pass arithmetic expressions, so a minus would do... -- Luben
Home Last updated: Thu Mar 21 16:18:15 2002 9258 messages in chronological order |