|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE:I wonder if this is how Ray Tomlinson felt when he had to select a seperator... Hmmmm this one doesn't seem to be used for much, lets use it Bill On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, John Hufferd wrote: > > What about using the ~ (tittle) symbol. > > . > . > . > John L. Hufferd > Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) > IBM/SSG San Jose Ca > Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403, eFax: (408) 904-4688 > Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702 > Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com > > > "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 03/21/2002 > 07:47:11 AM > > Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu > > > To: "Rod Harrison" <rod.harrison@windriver.com> > cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: RE: > > > > > I was looking at what would be appropriate (and perhaps familiar to > programmers - double dot is used in Pascal for ranges). (- or +) may come > handy later for other things. And BTW double characters are already there > in addresses. > We could use semicolon(;) (I for some reason do not like it). > > So we have 2 proposals: > > 1) .. (2 votes) > 2); (1 vote?) > > The tally is on! (untill tomorrow) > > Julo > > > > > > "Rod Harrison" > <rod.harrison@windriver. To: Julian > com> Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, > <ips@ece.cmu.edu> > 21-03-02 02:04 cc: > Please respond to "Rod Subject: RE: > Harrison" > > > > > > > I would prefer one character. I don't care what it is, any > character > will do, but having only one there is slightly easier to parse that > having two. > > - Rod > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of > Julian Satran > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:05 PM > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: > > > Dear colleagues, > > I suggested using : (colon) to separate values in a range. > Unfortunately : > is overused (in addresses and in names). > I suggest we use the (old) two dots (..) to mark a range. > > Comments? > Julo > > > > > > >
Home Last updated: Thu Mar 21 18:18:15 2002 9259 messages in chronological order |