RE: iSCSI: Range Separator

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

... and the winner is tilde (0x7e) - Julo

End-of-Thread (hopefully!)


                                                                                                                
                      "Rod Harrison"                                                                            
                      <rod.harrison@win        To:       "LEMAY,KEVIN (A-Roseville,ex1)"                        
                      driver.com>               <kevin_lemay@agilent.com>, Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL        
                                               cc:       <ips@ece.cmu.edu>                                      
                      21-03-02 19:06           Subject:  RE: iSCSI: Range Seperator                             
                      Please respond to                                                                         
                      "Rod Harrison"                                                                            
                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                




             I don't care what the character is since the focus is to make
this
easy to parse, and not human readable. So to that end consider my vote
to be for whichever of the single characters is nearest to winning.
;-)

             However, if we do have to pay some mind to aesthetics then how
about
the < character? So we would have MyKey=3<65,93<123

             - Rod

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
LEMAY,KEVIN (A-Roseville,ex1)
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:20 PM
To: 'Julian Satran'
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: RE: Range Seperator


I do not like the ';' but I would prefer a single character. There
have been
objections to using the comma or colon, then my third choice is the
".."

I really don't see any conflict using either the comma or colon.

Using comma is already used to separate list values. Colon being used
in
addresses is irrelevant because those are different parameters. I
certainly
keep track of which one we are working on.

Kevin Lemay

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:47 AM
To: Rod Harrison
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: RE:



I was looking at what would be appropriate (and perhaps familiar to
programmers - double dot is used in Pascal for ranges).  (- or +) may
come
handy later for other things. And BTW double characters are already
there in
addresses.
We could use semicolon(;) (I for some reason do not like it).

So we have 2 proposals:

1) .. (2 votes)
2); (1 vote?)

The tally is on! (untill tomorrow)

Julo





             "Rod Harrison" <rod.harrison@windriver.com>


21-03-02 02:04
Please respond to "Rod Harrison"



        To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
        cc:
        Subject:        RE:





                I would prefer one character. I don't care what it is,
any
character
will do, but having only one there is slightly easier to parse that
having two.

                - Rod

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
Julian Satran
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:05 PM
To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject:


Dear colleagues,

I suggested using : (colon) to separate values in a range.
Unfortunately :
is overused (in addresses and in names).
I suggest we use the (old) two dots (..) to mark a range.

Comments?
Julo