|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: SRP statusThanks for the clarification. The draft was clear... that's why I was wondering, interpreting wrongly "another organization" as "an organization other then the deploying organization". Regards, Ofer Ofer Biran Storage and Systems Technology IBM Research Lab in Haifa biran@il.ibm.com 972-4-8296253 David Jablon <dpj@theworld.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 27/03/2002 02:42:03 Please respond to David Jablon <dpj@theworld.com> Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu To: Ofer Biran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL cc: Black_David@emc.com, ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: iSCSI: SRP status Yes. The words "another organization" mean "an organization other than the owner of the SPEKE patent". The draft is intended to clearly explain that the methods are subject to a patent currently owned by Phoenix. Please let me know if you find any of the language there to be unclear. -- David At 08:16 PM 3/26/02 +0200, Ofer Biran wrote: >Can you clarify the statement > >"...and that have been commercially deployed without licensing another >organization's patents." > >Aren't you talking here about the patented SPEKE methods ? > > > Thanks, > Ofer > > >Ofer Biran >Storage and Systems Technology >IBM Research Lab in Haifa >biran@il.ibm.com 972-4-8296253
Home Last updated: Sat Mar 30 12:18:17 2002 9394 messages in chronological order |