|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: ISCSI: Unsolicited data in draft v12John, It's not so much an implementation problem but one resource management problem in that if unsolicited data has been negotiated then target MUST pre-allocate buffers with which to store the unsolicited when it arrives. The target implementors will decided whether they want to use unsolicted data and take the buffer resource hit in doing so. However, if they do wish to take this hit but the initators decide not to use unsolicited data (even though they have negotiated to use it) then there is potientially a lot of valuable buffer resources tied in up for unsolicited data but which is not being used. Matthew -----Original Message----- From: John Hufferd [mailto:hufferd@us.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:13 AM To: BURBRIDGE,MATTHEW (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2) Cc: 'Julian Satran'; Rod Harrison; ips@ece.cmu.edu; owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: RE: ISCSI: Unsolicited data in draft v12 Please explain, why an initiator deciding to not send unsolicited data for a specific command causes an implementation problem. That was not clear from your statements. You still need the R2T capability, so what is lost? . . . John L. Hufferd Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) IBM/SSG San Jose Ca Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403, eFax: (408) 904-4688 Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702 Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com "BURBRIDGE,MATTHEW (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2)" <matthew_burbridge@hp.com> @ece.cmu.edu on 04/08/2002 10:25:55 AM Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu To: "'Julian Satran'" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>, Rod Harrison <rod.harrison@windriver.com> cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu, owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: RE: ISCSI: Unsolicited data in draft v12 I must express my concern on this issue. From a target point of view once it has negoiated the use of unsolicited data it has to allocate buffer space for that unsolicited data. Now depending on the various parameters this may be a sizeable chunk of valuable resources which it is making available. Now if the decision to use unsolicited data is being moved from a per session to per task basis (which is what this change effectively does) then it puts an awful lot of resource overhead on the target which may never be used. For the reasons above I propose that we do not relax the v12 restriction and keep it as: "An iSCSI initiator MUST send as unsolicited data either the negotiated amount or all the data if the total amount is less than the negotiated amount for unsolicited data." Matthew Burbridge Principal Engineer NSAS-Bristol Hewlett Packard -----Original Message----- From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 9:36 AM To: Rod Harrison Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu; owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: ISCSI: Unsolicited data in draft v12 OK - Julo "Rod Harrison" <rod.harrison@windriver.com> Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu 08-04-02 14:52 Please respond to "Rod Harrison" To: <ips@ece.cmu.edu> cc: Subject: ISCSI: Unsolicited data in draft v12 I propose we slightly relax the new restriction in draft v12 that the initiator MUST send the maximum permissible amount of unsolicited data. I suggest we change the rule to allow the initiator to either send no unsolicited data, or the maximum permissible. There is no difficulty for the target here since the lack of unsolicited data will be clearly indicated by a command PDU with F bit set and dataSegLen=0. The target will have all the information it needs to immediately issue R2Ts as appropriate. I believe the initiator should be able to make a policy decision on which individual commands should be sent with unsolicited data and which should not. In draft 11.91 section 2.2.4 I suggest we change "An iSCSI initiator MUST send as unsolicited data either the negotiated amount or all the data if the total amount is less than the negotiated amount for unsolicited data." to something like "An iSCSI initiator MAY choose to send no unsolicited data with a command, or if any unsolicited data is sent it MUST be either the negotiated amount or all the data if the total amount is less than the negotiated amount for unsolicited data." - Rod
Home Last updated: Mon Apr 08 15:18:18 2002 9552 messages in chronological order |