|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI draft 12 'or Reserved' fieldsShould be 0 means somebody may want to test it. Why do you feel that we can't keep silent on this (as all other SCSI standards). Those fields are for SCSI use and this is the way they are usually dealt with in SCSI. Julo
//My bad. I meant Status instead of Response //I guess what the draft is saying is that these fields are never reserved because they could contain anything //if not valid. Validity has to be checked before any guess is made on the field's contents. //Is this a correct interpretation of the draft's intention? 9.4.2 Status The Status field is used to report the SCSI status of the command (as specified in [SAM2]) and is valid only if the Response Code is Command Completed at target. //Bidirectional count //I guess I do not see much difference between this: 9.4.5 Bidirectional Read Residual Count The Bidirectional Read Residual Count field is only valid in the case where either the u bit or the o bit is set. If neither bit is set, the Bidirectional Read Residual Count field SHOULD be zero. 9.4.7 ExpDataSN The number of Data-In (read) PDUs the target has sent for the command. This field is reserved if the response code is not Command Completed at Target or the command is a write command. //And this(, except for the SHOULD vs. MUST) 9. iSCSI PDU Formats All multi-byte integers that are specified in formats defined in this document are to be represented in network byte order (i.e., big endian). Any field that appears in this document assumes that the most significant byte is the lowest numbered byte and the most signif- icant bit (within byte or field) is the lowest numbered bit unless specified otherwise. Any compliant sender MUST set all bits not defined and all reserved fields to zero unless specified otherwise. Any compliant receiver MUST ignore any bit not defined and all reserved fields unless speci- fied otherwise. Reserved fields are marked by the word "reserved", some abbreviation of "reserved" or by "." for individual bits when no other form of marking is technically feasible. > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:39 AM > To: Randy Jennings > Subject: RE: iSCSI draft 12 'or Reserved' fields > > > Response is always used. > Bidir - I am not sure - the text says whhen it should be valid and it is > not reserved otherwise. > > Thanks, > Julo >
Home Last updated: Fri Apr 19 17:18:25 2002 9730 messages in chronological order |