SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT

SEARCH

RE: Section 4.1 clarifications

To: Julian Satran <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: Section 4.1 clarifications
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@wasabisystems.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: <pat_thaler@agilent.com>, <ips@ece.cmu.edu>, <iscsiteam@windriver.com>, <michael.krueger@windriver.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <OF8CDFAE91.1C6AF230-ONC2256BA7.00647BC1@telaviv.ibm.com>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Julian Satran wrote:

> OK let's all settle on 64 and close the thread. Julo

Sounds great.

Pat, yea, I meant numbers that in binary form are 64 bits. :-)

Take care,

Bill

References:
- RE: Section 4.1 clarifications
  - From: "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: RE: questions about FCIP connection failure detection
Next by Date: Re: Document Action: iSCSI Requirements and Design Considerations to Informational
Prev by thread: Re: Section 4.1 clarifications
Next by thread: Re: iSCSI: Questions regarding text parameter 'Reject' and 'Irrelevant' usage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Fri Apr 26 19:18:24 2002
9817 messages in chronological order