|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: FCIP Last Call, comment 109 - Special FrameYes, that's fine. --David > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Weber [mailto:ralphoweber@compuserve.com] > Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 11:24 AM > To: IPS Reflector > Cc: David Black > Subject: Re: FCIP Last Call, comment 109 - Special Frame > > > David, > > Forgive me for testing the boundaries of our "violent agreement". > > Would the following sentence (in the new FSF Usage section) be > acceptable: > > "Note: Owing to the limited manner in which the FSF is used and > the requirement that the FSF be echoed without changes before > a TCP connection is allowed to carry user data, no error checking > beyond that provided by TCP is deemed necessary." > > Thanks. > > .Ralph > > Black_David@emc.com wrote: > > > Ralph, > > > > > Regarding: > > > > > > > That [always closing the TCP connection if the SF data changes] > > > > would be fine if the received data were always discarded when a > > > > change occurred that caused connection closure. My > understanding > > > > of the "poor man's SLP" scenario is that the received > data is intended > > > > to be used even though the connection was closed. > TCP-grade data > > > > integrity may be ok for that use - if that's the case, a single > > > > sentence saying that as part of the new description of > "poor man's > > > > SLP" should be sufficient to close this issue. > > > > > > I have no problems with adding the requested sentence. > > > > > > However... > > > > > > I believe that your understanding of the "poor man's SLP" scenario > > > continues to reflect a misunderstanding of the intrinsic checks > > > that it contains. > > > > We're in violent agreement. When the data in an SF is changed, the > > intent is that the resulting data is to be used to make a new > > TCP connection. If the data is corrupt/incorrect, things will go > > wrong on that connection; preventing this is desirable and the > > TCP checksum is deemed to be a sufficient preventative measure. > > > > Thanks, > > --David > > --------------------------------------------------- > > David L. Black, Senior Technologist > > EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > > +1 (508) 249-6449 *NEW* FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500 > > black_david@emc.com Cell: +1 (978) 394-7754 > > --------------------------------------------------- > > >
Home Last updated: Mon Apr 29 13:18:29 2002 9838 messages in chronological order |