|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: Flipped locations between d11 and d12.The new notation is counter intuitive and causes confusion. If there is no specific reasoni would prefer it to be the way it was in earlier drafts (D11). -ranga > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:35 AM > To: Sankar, Ranga > Cc: 'ips@ece.cmu.edu'; Julian Satran > Subject: Re: Flipped locations between d11 and d12. > > > > It is no mistake. It is only that this new notation is the > one preferred by > the RFC editor. > > Julo > > > > > "Sankar, Ranga" > > <Ranga.Sankar@net To: > "'ips@ece.cmu.edu'" <ips@ece.cmu.edu> > > app.com> cc: > Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL > > Subject: > Flipped locations between d11 and d12. > > 05/21/2002 10:54 > > PM > > Please respond to > > "Sankar, Ranga" > > > > > > > > > > Looks like the bit locations are flipped between Version 11 and 12. > > For example Bit 0 of Byte 1 corresponds to T bit in Version 12 > In Version 11 and below Bit 7 of Byte 1 corresponds to T bit. > > Is this intended or an error in the draft. > > Version 12 > > Login Response > Byte / 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 > | > |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7| > <--------- > . . 0x23 > > Version 11 > Byte / 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | / | | | | > |7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0|7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0|7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0|7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0| > <---------- > +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+ > 0|.|.| 0x23 |T|0 0 0|CSG|NSG| Version-max | > Version-active| > > -ranga > > > >
Home Last updated: Wed May 22 15:18:38 2002 10209 messages in chronological order |