|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: Flipped locations between d11 and d12.The new notation has a long history of use in networking specifications and is required (not just "preferred") in all IETF standards-track RFCs. See the "Bit and Byte order in drawings" Section of http://www.ietf.org/ID-nits.html It's unfortunate that we caught the need to make this change relatively late in the process, but the change does need to be made ... otherwise the draft will be returned to the WG with instructions to make the change. Thanks, --David --------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 249-6449 *NEW* FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500 black_david@emc.com Cell: +1 (978) 394-7754 --------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Sankar, Ranga [mailto:ranga@netapp.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:28 PM > To: 'Julian Satran' > Cc: 'ips@ece.cmu.edu'; Pittman, Joseph > Subject: RE: Flipped locations between d11 and d12. > > > The new notation is counter intuitive and causes confusion. > If there is no specific reasoni would prefer it to be the way it > was in earlier drafts (D11). > > -ranga > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:35 AM > > To: Sankar, Ranga > > Cc: 'ips@ece.cmu.edu'; Julian Satran > > Subject: Re: Flipped locations between d11 and d12. > > > > > > > > It is no mistake. It is only that this new notation is the > > one preferred by > > the RFC editor. > > > > Julo > > > > > > > > > > "Sankar, Ranga" > > > > <Ranga.Sankar@net To: > > "'ips@ece.cmu.edu'" <ips@ece.cmu.edu> > > > > app.com> cc: > > Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL > > > > Subject: > > Flipped locations between d11 and d12. > > > > 05/21/2002 10:54 > > > > PM > > > > Please respond to > > > > "Sankar, Ranga" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looks like the bit locations are flipped between Version 11 and 12. > > > > For example Bit 0 of Byte 1 corresponds to T bit in Version 12 > > In Version 11 and below Bit 7 of Byte 1 corresponds to T bit. > > > > Is this intended or an error in the draft. > > > > Version 12 > > > > Login Response > > Byte / 0 | 1 | 2 > | 3 > > | > > |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7| > > <--------- > > . . 0x23 > > > > Version 11 > > Byte / 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | / | | | | > > |7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0|7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0|7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0|7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0| > > <---------- > > +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+ > > 0|.|.| 0x23 |T|0 0 0|CSG|NSG| Version-max | > > Version-active| > > > > -ranga > > > > > > > > >
Home Last updated: Thu May 23 14:18:27 2002 10256 messages in chronological order |