|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI:Can each do there own thing?On Wed, 29 May 2002, Martins Krikis wrote: [very large snip] > Summary: > > 1. "no-originating on split-key scheme" > 2. "no-originating (except declarations) on split-key scheme" > 3. "no-originating on split-pair scheme" > 4. "no-originating (except declarations) on split-pair scheme" > 5. "empty-PDUs until end-of-data scheme" > 6. "empty-PDU on split-pair scheme" 7. "no-originating until end-of-data scheme" (I added 7) My preference is for 5 or 7. I think having to check for a split key or pair before making the decision on what to send is undesireable. However, I would also like to point out that 5 is almost equivalent to allowing an unlimited PDU size (or a PDU size up to the buffer size at the end of 4.1) during negotiation. The only difference is that the receiver can pace the arrival of the data by sending blank PDUs with 5 but it is not clear to me that that makes much implementation difference when one must be able to buffer the whole negotiation. Regards, Pat
Home Last updated: Thu May 30 15:18:37 2002 10418 messages in chronological order |