|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI-12-95Julian, I am having two problems with the second MUST in the following paragraph from iSCSI-12-95 7.2.1: If CHAP is used with a secret that has less than 96 random bits then IPsec encryption (according to the implementation requirements in Section 7.3.2 Confidentiality) MUST be used to protect the connection. Moreover, in this case IKE authentication with group pre-shared keys MUST NOT be used. When CHAP is used with secret shorter than 96 bits, a compliant implementation MUST NOT continue with the login unless it can verify that IPsec encryption is being used to protect the connection. Who or what does the requirement apply to? Is the iSCSI implementation expected to check whether IKE is using pre-shared keys or is this a requirement on the person setting up the security? It isn't clear to me that an iSCSI implementation has access to that information. Secondly, it isn't clear to me why it is required. I'm assuming the concern is that a member of a group with preshared keys could use an off-line dictionary attack to crack the CHAP secret of another member of the group but it seems to me that there are situations where this is not a threat. For instance, one could have a group that was a host and multiple equally secure disk arrays. If one isn't concerned about one of the arrays trying to impersonate another there isn't a danger in allowing them to authenticate with CHAP protected by IPsec enryption with a group pre-shared key. Could the MUST be made a SHOULD with a statement that ignoring the SHOULD means that one member of the group could crack the CHAP secret of another member? Regards, Pat -----Original Message----- From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 3:02 PM To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: iSCSI-12-95 12-95 is out. It has the latest wording on security and text negotiation (including the spanning). Still to go - text fixes in chapter 11. Julo
Home Last updated: Fri May 31 08:18:57 2002 10431 messages in chronological order |