SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: Some proposed vendor-specific (X-) keys



    I like it.
    Otherwise the user has to configure the initiator with the target type and
    the target with the initiator type.
    It is unlikely that this problem will disappear for a long time if ever.
    As the threads on the C bit has shown there will be lots of ways to
    implement the spec and probably no device will correctly support all possibilities.
    I am already putting "if (vendor)" code in my implementation. Maybe in a few
    years I will not need it. But until then it would be nice if I could dynamically determine
    vendor information for iscsi so the user does not have to configure it.
    Bob
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: "Ken Sandars" <ksandars@eurologic.com>
    To: "Ips Reflector (E-mail)" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
    Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:43 AM
    Subject: iSCSI: Some proposed vendor-specific (X-) keys
    
    
    > Hi all,
    > 
    > Can all you implementers out there consider this proposal please? This is 
    > intended to be an aid to interoperability. Obviously once the spec is 
    > approved and everyone is fully complient there will be no need for this.
    > 
    > This proposal is in no means intended to go into the specification (unless 
    > people REALLY want it), so feel free to skip this message now ;-)
    > 
    > I suggest three vendor specific declarative keys which MAY/SHOULD be sent 
    > during the login phase (during the operational parameter negotiation stage):
    > 
    > X-vendor
    > X-product
    > X-revision
    > 
    > These all contains strings, eg:
    > 
    > X-vendor=fredsIscsiShop
    > X-product=YetAnotherIscsiTarget
    > X-revision=1.003
    > 
    > These keys follow the SCSI inquiry command fields in terms of names, and are 
    > used to identify the iSCSI node's information.
    > 
    > What does this achieve? I'm looking for an opportunity to provide automated 
    > interoperability between systems which are not yet fully complient.
    > 
    > But I hear you think, "But why don't they just fix them?", and I have to 
    > agree.
    > 
    > However, there are a number of iSCSI products which work wonderfully well 
    > already out there (as long as you don't excite one of their quirks). If you 
    > find out what you are connecting with during login, you can decide what 
    > things you should or shouldn't do with it.
    > 
    > 
    > -- 
    > Ken Sandars
    > Eurologic Systems Ltd
    > ksandars@eurologic.com
    


Home

Last updated: Thu Jun 06 16:18:43 2002
10552 messages in chronological order