|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: Some proposed vendor-specific (X-) keysOn Thursday 06 June 2002 11:57 pm, Bill Studenmund wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 pat_thaler@agilent.com wrote: > > Bill, > > > > If x-keys are used for this then they should be given proper x-key names: > > x-reversed.dns_name.key_name > > > > It is a bad precedent to ignore domain naming in some of the first > > x-keys. People wouldn't want the dns name to be a vendor name in this > > case but perhaps a neutral party such as SNIA or UNH would be willing to > > have its domain name used for such keys (and they have nice short DNS > > names). > > True. Point taken. Any volinteers? > I agree that proper vendor-specific x-keys should use the reverse-dns format as stated. However, in this case the proposed keys are generic (for the good of all) and I'd hope are consistent. Can we have a set of "well-known" X-keys which just start "X-"? It certainly is a legal format according to the spec. Support of course would be completely optional for these. -- Ken Sandars Eurologic Systems Ltd ksandars@eurologic.com
Home Last updated: Fri Jun 07 10:18:40 2002 10565 messages in chronological order |