|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Security -13 draftGood points. I will work on consolidating the iSCSI authentication text, and adding mention of CHAP to section 5.8.3. >From: Philip MacKenzie <philmac@research.bell-labs.com> >To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> >CC: ips@ece.cmu.edu >Subject: Re: Security -13 draft >Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 13:36:24 -0400 > > > A -13 version of the security draft is available for your examination >at: > > > > http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/IPS/draft-ietf-ips-security-13.txt > > > > Since this is potentially the version that will go to WG last call, a >careful reading is encouraged. > > >This seemed odd to me: > >SRP is given what seems like an offhand comment in >section 5.8.3, which seems totally incongruous to the >laborious SRP implementation details given in >section 5.10 and Appendix A. > >Why all the details for something that's just mentioned >in passing as an alternative authentication method? >Also, why in section 5.8.3 is CHAP not mentioned, given >that it is the MUST implement method? > >-Phil > _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Home Last updated: Fri Jun 07 13:18:45 2002 10581 messages in chronological order |