|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: response reasonMallikarjun, The reference was clearly wrong (your note make it sound it was right). I will fix the wording to match SPC with iSCSI. Julo
Julian, I was about to send a message to you on this myself. I think it's better to leave the wording in 12-96 as is, and change the "Reason" to "Response reason" in the table in section 9.4.6.2. The problem with the changed wording in 12-97 is that it still does not mention the sense key, and states something that isn't accurate (for ex., there is no 'Sense of "protocol service CRC error" ', the SPC-3 name for it is "CRC error detected"). The more descriptive "reason" terminology is an iSCSI notion we had adopted quite a while ago. I reason I had used "Response reason" as in index into the said table is to avoid repeating the CHECKCONDITION/Key/ ASC/ASCQ information everywhere - but I had overlooked that the table doesn't use "response reason". I'd recommend fixing just that. Thanks. -- Mallikarjun Mallikarjun Chadalapaka Networked Storage Architecture Network Storage Solutions Hewlett-Packard MS 5668 Roseville CA 95747 cbm@rose.hp.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com> To: <Eddy@Quicksall.com> Cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:07 AM Subject: Re: iSCSI: response reason > thanks - it is fixed in 12-97 - Julo > > > > "Eddy Quicksall" > <Eddy@Quicksall.c To: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL > om> cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu> > Subject: iSCSI: response reason > 06/06/2002 11:28 > PM > Please respond to > Eddy > > > > > > Section 6.5 Digest Errors uses the phrase "iSCSI response reason" and > refers to section 9.4.3. But there is no such term used in that section. > > There is, however, a term used called "iSCSI service response". But, > section 6.5 is not talking about that. > > I believe section 6.5 is talking about the heading "reason" that appears in > the 1st column of the table in section 9.4.6.2. > > So to clarify things, how about changing the table heading in 9.4.6.2 to > say "iSCSI Condition" and section 6.5 to say "iSCSI Condition (Section > 9.4.6.2 Sense Data)? > > The term "iSCSI Condition" is also compatible with the same term used in > the 2nd paragraph of 9.4.6.2. > > Eddy > > > >
Home Last updated: Mon Jun 10 00:18:40 2002 10618 messages in chronological order |