|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: Some proposed vendor-specific (X-) keysBill Studenmund wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Luben Tuikov wrote: > > > Bill Studenmund wrote: > > > > > > > > > That comment reflects a very nice ideal. My concern is that I'm not sure > > > we're there. What about Luben's comments that there are existing > > > interoperability problems among compliant systems? AS I understand him, > > > compliant *iSCSI* systems. ?? > > > > I haven't checked for those lately, (especially in the login procedure), > > but any time you see ``MAY'' or ``may'' in the draft and a target > > and initiator arrive at different outcomes _just_ by taking one > > or the other route, you have ``compliant-non-interoperability'' > > (as you coined the term). > > I must say that's not what I had in mind when I coined the phrase. I don't > think the fact we let folks make different choices at MAY points is bad. > That's the point. You (as Paul) didn't read this sentence (quoted here from above): Any time you see ``MAY'' or ``may'' in the draft and a target and initiator arrive at different outcomes _just_ by taking one or the other route, you have ``compliant-non-interoperability''. Which is what you are describing in more ``baby-terms'' below. Read my reply to Paul, where I give 2 links to emails where this is described well -- this has since been fixed in the draft. BTW, I don't like ``MAY'' and ``may'' -- I don't use those two words personally and I sure don't like them in the spec as well. > I thought most of them were of the form, you MAY close the connection, or > you MAY do some error cleanup & try to recover. So both sides know > something happened. > > What I'd be worried about are places where different sides both thing > things are ok, but get on entirely different pages as to what exactly is > going on. > > *Those* are what I was thinking of when I came up with compliant-non- > interoperability. :-) But you are merely repeating what I'm saying above... (and in my previous email). -- Luben
Home Last updated: Mon Jun 10 15:18:46 2002 10635 messages in chronological order |